Port 0

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Port 0

Post by ssj100 on 8/3/2011, 14:16

Has anyone ever heard of a malicious exploit involving Port 0? If not, is it theoretically possible?

_________________
Sandboxie + LUA + SRP + DEP + SuRun
Windows Firewall + NAT Router + IPSec (on-demand)
VirtualBox (on-demand)
Drive SnapShot (on-demand)
avatar
ssj100
Administrator
Administrator

Posts : 1389
Join date : 2010-04-14

View user profile http://ssj100.fullsubject.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Port 0

Post by tnegjm on 8/3/2011, 21:59

The only issues I've heard of awhile back was some DOS attacks on unix servers using Port 0. Other than that I thought port 0 wasn't used.

tnegjm
Member
Member

Posts : 37
Join date : 2010-04-20

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Post by Dude111 on 5/7/2011, 01:51

Everyone should have EVERY PORT STEALTHED!! (Even port 0)

Thats sadly the only safest way,dont have ANY PORTS OPEN OR EVEN 'CLOSED',having them 'stealthed' is the safest!!

Dude111
Member
Member

Posts : 25
Join date : 2010-07-25

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Port 0

Post by Stephen2 on 9/7/2011, 09:51

Dude111 wrote:ANY PORTS OPEN OR EVEN 'CLOSED',having them 'stealthed' is the safest!!
Stealthing ports doesn't make you any safer than closed ports. Ridiculous FUD spread by firewall developers.

I know the argument "If you don't respond at ALL, the attacker will think you don't exist which is safer."

There are two kinds of attackers:

1) Port scanning on a particular port for a whole range of IPs, looking for one listening. Stealth = Closed

2) Dedicated hacker attacking your IP directly. Already knows you exist. Stealth = Closed

Nobody is there saying "Well, I scanned 114.76.70.1 to 114.76.70.254 on port 80 but no vulnerable ports were found, HOWEVER, 114.76.70.187 didn't respond at all, so I'll exclude it from future scans"

Look, I guess stealthing ports doesn't hurt in any way but it's NO safer than closed ports and even open ports (as long as you're not listening with a program/service that has a vulnerability).

FUD filled comments like yours "Dude111" are more than a bit over the top.


Admin note:Please try not to make personal comments in future, finger pointing etc is not acceptable on this forum.


Last edited by patrick on 9/7/2011, 17:45; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : typo)

Stephen2
Member
Member

Posts : 34
Join date : 2010-10-18
Location : Melbourne, Australia

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Port 0

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum